|
Welcome aboard!
|
||
|
Our
written
history may comprise some 300
surplus years, as the records about the early middle ages have been
messed up...
Some 20 years ago, I read about this 'weird' thesis for the first time. As a physicist, I began to look for scientific evidence and for a theory, free of conspirations. Some startling results: »Year-count
Dichotomy«
explains observations of science!
Events come with two different year-numbers! 'Fake' documents turn out to be authentical!
|
||
|
The chief witness:
|
||
|
»..they
have made the Antiquities of Greece three or four hundred years elder
than the truth.«
|
||
|
Hard Facts
|
||
|
Antique
eclipse reports: 109529 days too early! 32
recorded cycles of comet Halley |
||
|
Duplications
|
||
|
Duplicate tradition of the East |
||
|
Graphics
– who is who?
|
||
|
20
funny
hypotheses
 Empress Editha fed on Fish |
||
|
Criticism
and Response
|
||
|
Comic
–
why the delusion?
|
||
 Gerbert
&Otto3 in The miraculous surge of the Carolingians |
||
|
interesting?
Please forward!
|
||
|
Kindly support the
efforts to
disseminate unprejudiced information about our history!
© H-E Korth
|
»On Emperors order,
the Pope will
purge the centuries« Leo
of
Vercelli 998 to Gregory V.
| What? | Traditional historiography intermixes different year-counts! |
| Why? | Cl. Ptolemy mistakenly had
antedated his observations by 299 years |
Unbelievable?
In fact, an ever increasing number of contradictions between datable
events and traditional chronology was found over the centuries. Today,
a multitude of conjectures has to support historiography. The latter
remained unaffected, because the critics were not able to offer
acceptable explanations for all the incongruities.Now, there is rock-solid evidence (see below). So things change. Strange records begin to make sense!
Possibly, the disorder of our history has started with the keen decision of a single person. [more...]
- Claudius Ptolemy had forged the longitudes within the Almagest by 7,5°;
- Earth's temperature followed the increase of CO2 with a delay of 1200 years;
- Empress Egditha had been nourished mainly on fish...
Eventually, Claudius Ptolemy adopted the error¹. In addition, he had no knowledge of the equinoctial migration. After all, he presumed Hipparchos, likewise, had made his observations at Alexandria. Altogether, Ptolemy's misapprehensions reduced the virtual span since Hipparchos' measurements by 299 years.
However, a set of well recorded astronomical events, unique within history, allows to correct the displacement of Ptolemy. Various prior attemps had failed, to join events dated with Ptolemy's model unambiguously with other periodical references. Instead, chronists were blamed for neglectfulness. Ptolemy was accused to be a plagiator.
1) https://archive.org/stream/desclaudiusptole01ptoluoft/desclaudiusptole01ptoluoft_djvu.txt
The legendary recovery of the 7 Sleepers from Ephesos, undisputably the 'Greatest Wonder of God', may have been an attempt to accept the missing times.
Hipparchos |
 Battani |
Silvester II.
(† 1003 CE) |
Who were these protagonists? What was their motivation? How could they do it? What were the consequences?
A brief summary without physics and math:
- The half-time of 14C can be determined quite accurately in the lab.
- To use the 14C decay for dating, atmospheric variations over time must be known.
- IntCal -calibration juxtaposes 14C measurements and dendrochronological age.
- Base for the radiocarbon age '0' is the year 1950 ('presence').
- This base is defined indirectly referring to the age 130 before present <> 1820 CE.
- However, analysis of Sequoia data over two millennia results in 64 BP <> 1886 CE.
- Correlations measured by L.-A. Larsson show a hiatus against Roman wood samples (328 <?> 546 CE).
- The 'well-known' age of Roman samples has led to the assumption of a lower 14C level over antiquity.
- This implicit recalibration adds some 300 years to the measuered radiocarbon age value.
- As a consequence, the slope of the 'Dendro-age' for antiquity will be reduced by 15%.
- A comparison against the Sulphate of Ice-cores confirms a deviation of 15% -290 years.
- With a correction of base-year and hiatus, IntCal data will produce adequate radiocarbon age values.
[more in the PDF...]- If the CE-date calculated traditionally for a solar eclipse record were correct, a deviating coverage (or the location) reported must necessarily be inaccurate. A specified location on Earth will see totality or annularity typically only once within 140 years. For an accidental match within a span of 295-305 years after the traditional date, the chance will be 1 : 14.
- 300 years minus 46 days after the correctly calculated date another eclipse may occur. If it shows the coverage mentioned in the report, this could only happen by sheer coincidence.
- Otherwise, if the coverage and location of a solar eclipse were reported accurately, then the retro-calculated CE-date cannot be correct, when astronomical computations yield a significantly deviating coverage value.
- Besides: If the CE-dates were determined correctly, this would imply that most eye-witness reports of total solar eclipses did not survive until our times. Unlikely that these awesome events were not recorded. Unlikely that just those records were lost – in contrast to many 'obviously incorrect' reports on explicitly total eclipses, where, accidentally, the totality zone overlapped with the real path of a total solar eclipse 300 years later!
- The probability for more than 60 such events is close to zero.
Traditional chronology and astronomical retro-calculation stand in conflict: They mutually exclude each other!
The
incorruptible jewish year-count
Today we live in the
year 5771
of the Jewish World Era.
This is equivalent to our year 2011 CE. The year 1 JWE,
therefore, corresponds to our year 3761 BCE. Rabbi
Hillel, the originator of the jewish calendar, wrote his texts around
4116 JWE, what complies with the year 359 CE and matches with
the records of history.
The year numbers given by Hillel and the dates of jewish
tradition referring to these, must therefore be correct! [mehr...] 
The enforced Millennium – no way to ignore Charlemagne!
Early in the year 1000 CE the Emperor Otto III. visited Aachen. There he uncovered the relics of his ancester Càrolus, who had passed away 186 years before. Otto removed the burial objects and extracted a tooth from the skull. He replaced the missing nose of the dead by a gold sheet, before he left the crypt. What was the intention behind this ghoulish spectacle? It did generate 'evidence' for the newly set year-count scheme! [more...]
){kind=link}
A letter written by Leo of Vercelli
»Sub
caesaris potentia purgat
papa
secula« 'On the Emperor's order, the Pope will purge the
centuries'. Here we have the written
evidence for the clandestine reform of the year-count, laid down by the
protagonists...
[mehr...]
Pontificates of the early middle-ages
Can
the duplicate year-count be identified within the traditional sequence
of the roman popes? Were these doubled, too? The records about these
early leaders of the Church are rather poor...
[mehr...]
Chronology
and written records
Observations again confirm
the thesis of the
manipulated medieval chronology, giving hints about possible
motivations and procedures. Gave the wish to predominate over
non-trinitarian creeds the impulse to the rulers at Byzantium to
duplicate Constantine / Heracleios and their
followers? As a
reaction, occidental gouvernment matched the own records, adjusting so
to the eastern shift. [mehr...]
Astronomical Data from the Gospel
A
star,
standig still above Bethlehem, directing three kings? This sounds more
than unlikely! However, many people have given thoughts to the idea
that a special planet constellation has been meant or a comet. Seeking
in the wrong century, they missed the real event...
[mehr...]
Chronology and natural sciences
Does the hypothesis of
nearly three
deliberately inserted centuries really explain all observations, or are
the interrelations even more complex? Indeed: Some retrocalculated
events do match conventional chronology. However, all findings can now
be combined within a conclusive theory, and allow for the first time to
determine the accurate date of the devastating eruption of the Thera
volcano. [mehr...]
The Occident's Chronology – What are the clues from reproducible data?
A
critical survey of independent time-series
confirms the impression of a three centuries offset within occidental
history. Originally, as it appears, the deviation of history has been
confined to the Roman empire. The following 'infection' of other
peoples was the consequence of inappropriate synchronisation. A careful
analysis of radiocarbon and dendrochronology data reinforces this
sight.
[mehr...]
Global Warming and Chronology
Coherrent models, reaching
back into a
far
past, are required to understand the various influences on Earth's
temperature. About a delusive paradigm triggering quarrel among
scientists and a pseudo-correlation between temperature and
C14.
[mehr...]
„The Revelation of John“ by Nikolai A. Morosow
In this book,
published in 1907, N. Morosov
presented evidence that the Book of Revelation accurately describes the
virtually unique astronomical situation on the eve of September 30th
within the year 395. [mehr...]
Gerbert of Aurillac – † 12.Mai 1003
Gerbert
of Aurillac (pope Silvester II.) was
the most prominent scientist of his times. He teached a generation of
rulers, scientists and clergymen. Most likely, he was the mastermind
behind the re-adjustment of year-numbering. [mehr...]
Bishop
Thietmar
disbelieved in the year count he used!
Thietmar
of
Merseburg's (Freudian) slip here with his twofold
correction allows no other conclusion!
[First line of the 7th book of The History of the Diocese
of
Merseburg - fol.
142r, written about 1017]